_______________________________________________________________________________________________ Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) To Meet Requirements of "No Child Left Behind"(NCLB) The No Child Left Behind Act requires states to evaluate the performance of all students in all schools in order to determine whether each school and district has made adequate yearly progress (AYP). Specific criteria for AYP evaluation are described below. All schools that do not make AYP are identified. School districts are responsible for identifying Title I schools that fail to make AYP in consecutive years as schools in need of improvement. For the 2006-07 school year, requirements for school improvement apply to Title I schools that did not make AYP in 2004-05 and 2005-06.* Students attending these schools are eligible for public school choice options for the 2006-07 school year. Title I schools that fail to make AYP for more than two consecutive years are required to provide additional services to students and to implement defined strategies for improving school performance. * AYP results are evaluated separately for mathematics and reading in determining whether proficiency targets were missed in consecutive years and in targeting areas for improvement. Each school's AYP determination is based on measures of the performance of the overall student population as well as that of students in defined subgroups: racial/ethnic groups (Am. Indian, Asian, black, Hispanic, and white); students eligible for free/reduced-price lunch; limited English proficient (LEP) students; and students with disabilities. AYP Criteria for Florida's Public Schools . ________________________ Schools must have tested at least 95 percent of students in each subgroup where 30 or more students are enrolled. . ___________________ Schools in which less than 90 percent of students are proficient in writing must show an increase in the percentage of proficient students over the previous year. Students demonstrate writing proficiency by scoring 3 or higher(on a scale score of 1 to 6) on the FCAT Writing examination, or, for LEP students and students with disabilities, by attaining a proficient score on an alternate assessment. . _______________ High schools with a graduation rate less than 85% must show improvement in the rate over the previous year. . ________________________ The school performance grade must be other than a D or F. . ________________________________________ Schools must attain proficiency targets in reading and mathematics for each subgroup in which at least 30 students are enrolled. Students attain proficiency in reading and mathematics by scoring at Level 3 or higher(on a range from 1 to 5) on FCAT Reading and FCAT Mathematics, or, for LEP students and students with disabilities, by scoring at proficient levels on alternate assessments for reading and math. For 2005-06, AYP proficiency targets for all subgroups are as follows: 50 percent of students proficient in mathematics; 44 percent proficient in reading. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2005-06 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Run Date: 07/21/2006 Page 1 05-4011 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ . _____________________ Schools not meeting reading and math proficiency targets for subgroups may still make AYP through a Safe Harbor provision if the following conditions were met for subgroups missing the targets: 1) At least 95% of students were tested. 2) The percentage of non-proficient students in the subgroups(s) decreased by at least 10 percent from the prior year. 3) The percentage of the subgroup's students who tested proficient in writing increased. 4) The graduation rate of students in the subgroups(s) increased (high schools). The latest information on AYP can be accessed online at schoolgrades.fldoe.org/default.asp. AYP Status, 2005-06 (Indicates status prior to the end of the appeals period.) The table below shows the AYP status of the school, district, and state for the 2005-06 school year. Data used to calculate AYP for 2005-06 includes FCAT data for 2005-06 and 2004-05, graduation rate data for 2004-05 and 2003-04, and the school performance grade assigned in 2006. School AYP Status District AYP Status State AYP Status ____________________________________________________________________ 1 | 0 | 0 Key: 0 = "Did not make AYP." 1 = "Made AYP." 2 = "AYP not applicable."* 3 = "Provisional." *Certain schools fall below federal minimum enrollment requirements for evaluation of AYP criteria. Percentage of Your District's Title I Schools Identified for Improvement. The table below shows the number and percentage of Title I schools in your district that were identified for improvement in the coming year. Number of Title I Number of Title I Schools Percent of Title I Schools Schools in the District Identified for Improvement Identified for Improvement ___________________________________________________________________________________ 33 | 22 | 66.7 The following table shows the schools in your district that did not make AYP. Schools That Did Not Make AYP in the District, 2005-06 District Number School Number School Name _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 89 FIELDSTON PREPARATORY SCHOOL 5 1011 ROCKLEDGE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 5 1017 COGSWELL OFFSITE ALT ABEYANCE 5 1018 S AREA ALTERNATE ABEYANCE CNTR 5 1027 SPACE COAST MARINE INSTITUTE 5 1028 DEVEREUX HOSPITAL 5 1029 RIVERDALE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL 5 1032 HORACE MANN ACADEMY 5 1041 CAMBRIDGE ELEM MAGNET SCHOOL 5 1051 ENDEAVOUR ELEMENTARY MAGNET 5 6512 EINSTEIN MONTESSORI 5 6515 RIVER'S EDGE CHARTER ACADEMY ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2005-06 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Run Date: 07/21/2006 Page 2 05-4011 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Students enrolled during 2005-06 in the schools shown below are eligible for public school choice and/or supplemental services in 2006-07. District Number School Number School Name Number of Years Listed _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 71 RIVERVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 5 91 COQUINA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 101 MIMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 181 PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 1041 CAMBRIDGE ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL 3 5 1051 ENDEAVOUR ELEMENTARY MAGNET 4 5 1091 FAIRGLEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 1131 SATURN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 1141 HANS CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN ELEMENTARY 2 5 2051 UNIVERSITY PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 2081 PALM BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 2121 JOHN F. TURNER, SENIOR ELEMENTARY 2 5 2151 DISCOVERY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 2161 CHRISTA MCAULIFFE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 2171 RIVIERA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 5 2191 JUPITER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 2212 WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 3061 HARBOR CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 5 4031 MILA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 5 4101 GARDENDALE ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL 2 5 6141 DR. W.J. CREEL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 5 6515 RIVER'S EDGE CHARTER ACADEMY 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2005-06 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Run Date: 07/21/2006 Page 3 05-4011